MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551069776 · doi:10.1038/ncomms13390

The pangenome of an agronomically important crop plant Brassica oleracea

2016· article· en· W2551069776 on OpenAlexaff
Agnieszka A. Golicz, Philipp E. Bayer, Guy C. Barker, Patrick P. Edger, Hye Ran Kim, Paula Andrea Martinez, Chon‐Kit Kenneth Chan, Anita A. Severn‐Ellis, W. Richard McCombie, Isobel A. P. Parkin, Andrew H. Paterson, J. Chris Pires, Andrew Sharpe, Haibao Tang, Graham R. Teakle, Christopher D. Town, Jacqueline Batley, David Edwards

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaPlant Biotechnology InstituteSaskatchewan Research Council (Canada)Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersDivision of Integrative Organismal SystemsNational Cancer InstituteAustralian Research CouncilBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilNational Science FoundationUniversity of QueenslandQueensland University of TechnologyMonash UniversityUniversity of Technology SydneyAustralian GovernmentDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK GovernmentGriffith UniversityQueensland Cyber Infrastructure FoundationNational Computational InfrastructureGovernment of Western Australia
KeywordsBrassica oleraceaBiologyGeneGlucosinolateBrassicaceaeBrassicaGeneticsGenomeBrassica rapaCropBotanyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is an increasing awareness that as a result of structural variation, a reference sequence representing a genome of a single individual is unable to capture all of the gene repertoire found in the species. A large number of genes affected by presence/absence and copy number variation suggest that it may contribute to phenotypic and agronomic trait diversity. Here we show by analysis of the Brassica oleracea pangenome that nearly 20% of genes are affected by presence/absence variation. Several genes displaying presence/absence variation are annotated with functions related to major agronomic traits, including disease resistance, flowering time, glucosinolate metabolism and vitamin biosynthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations570
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207