Amorphous MoS<sub>3</sub> Infiltrated with Carbon Nanotubes as an Advanced Anode Material of Sodium‐Ion Batteries with Large Gravimetric, Areal, and Volumetric Capacities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The search for earth‐abundant and high‐performance electrode materials for sodium‐ion batteries represents an important challenge to current battery research. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides, particularly MoS 2 , have attracted increasing attention recently, but few of them so far have been able to meet expectations. In this study, it is demonstrated that another phase of molybdenum sulfide—amorphous chain‐like MoS 3 —can be a better choice as the anode material of sodium‐ion batteries. Highly compact MoS 3 particles infiltrated with carbon nanotubes are prepared via the facile acid precipitation method in ethylene glycol. Compared to crystalline MoS 2 , the resultant amorphous MoS 3 not only exhibits impressive gravimetric performance—featuring excellent specific capacity (≈615 mA h g −1 ), rate capability (235 mA h g −1 at 20 A g −1 ), and cycling stability but also shows exceptional volumetric capacity of ≈1000 mA h cm −3 and an areal capacity of >6.0 mA h cm −2 at very high areal loadings of active materials (up to 12 mg cm −2 ). The experimental results are supported by density functional theory simulations showing that the 1D chains of MoS 3 can facilitate the adsorption and diffusion of Na + ions. At last, it is demonstrated that the MoS 3 anode can be paired with an Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 cathode to afford full cells with great capacity and cycling performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".