MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551453762 · doi:10.1109/allerton.2012.6483230

Channel capacity in the non-asymptotic regime: Taylor-type expansion and computable benchmarks

2012· article· en· W2551453762 on OpenAlexaff
En‐hui Yang, Jin Meng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaylor seriesType (biology)Applied mathematicsComputable general equilibriumChannel (broadcasting)Asymptotic expansionComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical analysisEconomicsTelecommunicationsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the non-asymptotic counterpart of Shannon capacity is investigated for any discrete input memory-less channel with discrete or continuous output (DIMC). Given any block length n and word error probability ϵ, let R <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">n</sub> (ϵ) be the best channel coding rate achievable with the block length n subject to the error probability e. Based on the non-asymptotic equipartition properties (NEP) established recently by Yang and Meng, a quantity δ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">t, n</sub> (ϵ) is first defined to measure the relative magnitude of error probability ϵ and block length n with respect to a given DIMC and an input distribution t. Then, by combining the non-asymptotic achievability and converse established recently by Yang and Meng via jar decoding, it is shown that, given n and ϵ <; 1/2, R <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">n</sub> (ϵ) has a "Taylor-type expansion" with respect to δ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">t, n</sub> (ϵ), with the first two terms of the expansion being max <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">t</sub> [I (t; P)-δ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">t, n</sub> (ϵ)] = I(t*;P)-δ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">t*, n</sub> (ϵ) for some optimal distribution t*, and the third order term being O(δ <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">t*, n</sub> ) + O(ln n/n). Finally, based on the Taylor-type expansion and the non-asymptotic converse, two easy to compute approximation formulas for R <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">n</sub> (ϵ) (dubbed “SO” and “NEP”) are provided. Numerical results show that both the SO and NEP approximation formulas provide reliable and accurate estimation, in contrast with the normal approximation which sometimes falls below achievable bounds and sometimes rises above converses. An important implication arising from the Taylor-type expansion of R <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">n</sub> (ϵ) is that in the practical non-asymptotic regime, the optimal marginal codeword symbol distribution is not necessarily a Shannon capacity achieving distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207