MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2551490972 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316543832.008

Spherically Symmetric Thermo-Poroelasticity Problems for a Solid Sphere

2016· book-chapter· en· W2551490972 on OpenAlexaff
A. P. S. Selvadurai, A. P. Suvorov

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoromechanicsPiezometerPore water pressureGeotechnical engineeringPermeability (electromagnetism)Fluid pressureGeologyMechanicsMaterials sciencePhysicsPorous mediumPorosityChemistryGroundwater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this chapter, we continue to discuss the solutions to thermo-poroelasticity problems and to study effects that cannot be captured by one-dimensional poroelasticity analysis. Such an example is the Mandel–Cryer effect of amplification of the pore fluid pressure in a three-dimensional poroelastic analysis, which was identified by Mandel (1950) and Cryer (1963) and observed by Gibson et al. (1963) during radial loading of a saturated clay sphere. Of related interest are the studies by de Josselin de Jong (1953), where similar manifestations in the pore pressure response of piezometers installed in low-permeability soils such as clay were observed. References to further studies are also given by Selvadurai and Shirazi (2004a, b). The thermo-poroelastic problem for a hollow sphere subjected to a sudden rise in temperature and pressure on its inner wall was studied by Kodashima and Kurashige (1996). In their work, the heat transport equation included a nonlinear convective term; the analytical solution of the problem was obtained for the steady-state case, and the transient solution was obtained numerically. Rehbinder (1995) considered problems with cylindrical and spherical symmetries, and the stationary solutions for the nonlinear thermo-poroelastic problem were obtained using a perturbation technique. Belotserkovets and Prevost (2011) studied the transient response of a thermo-poroelastic sphere subjected to an applied radial stress; their goal was to characterize the influence of the applied stress on the change in temperature within the sphere. The poroelastic framework can also be extended to accommodate poroelastic solids that experience brittle damage, which could lead to micromechanical damage as opposed to failure; here the poroelastic behavior is maintained, albeit with altered mechanical and fluid transport properties (Mahyari and Selvadurai, 1998; Selvadurai and Mahyari, 1998; Selvadurai, 2004; Selvadurai and Shirazi, 2004a, b, 2005; Shirazi and Selvadurai, 2005; Massart and Selvadurai, 2012, 2014). This chapter examines thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) problems related to the three-dimensional deformation of a poroelastic sphere subjected to uniform heating at the boundary. Zero fluid pressure and zero radial stress are maintained at the boundary of the sphere at all times. The fluid flow and heat transfer in such a sphere occur only in the radial direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures→French-language works237,207→