MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551588716 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22751

Kinetic characteristics of the particles in a dense‐phase pulsed fluidized bed for dry beneficiation

2016· article· en· W2551588716 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Liang Dong, Bo Zhang, Yong Zhang, Yuemin Zhao, Enhui Zhou, Peng Lv, Chenlong Duan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBeneficiationAirflowCoalFluidized bedMixing (physics)FluidizationMaterials scienceMechanicsEnvironmental scienceParticle (ecology)Kinetic energyPhase (matter)BubbleWaste managementMetallurgyChemistryGeologyThermodynamicsPhysicsEngineeringClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Coal is one of the most important primary energy sources all over the world. Dry coal beneficiation is a hot topic in the mineral processing field because of severe environmental pollution and shortage of water resources. A dense‐phase pulsed fluidized bed (DPPFB) is proposed for the dry coal beneficiation of fine coal; an active pulsating airflow was introduced into an air dense medium fluidized bed (ADMFB). In this study, the kinetic characteristics of the particles in a DPPFB were investigated by computational particle fluid dynamics. The results show that the bubbles present in the DPPFB were much smaller than those in the ADMFB, and the motion of the dilute‐phase region replaced the motion of the large bubbles. Because of the action of the pulsating airflow, the motion of the heavy medium became uniform and steady. The back‐mixing phenomenon caused by the circulation motion of the heavy medium was suppressed significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207