MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551691100 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov225.27

NIMG-27USING MR PERFUSION TO STRATIFY PATIENTS WITH TREATED HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS: DOES IT CORRELATE WITH OVERALL SURVIVAL?

2015· article· en· W2551691100 on OpenAlexaff
Crystal Fong, Jeffrey Greenspoon, Sameer Parpia, Brian Yemen, Scott Tsai

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerfusionInternal medicineRadiologyOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: MR perfusion (MRP) is a relatively new technique, which may aid in identifying tumour recurrence in those with radically treated high-grade gliomas (HGG). Salvage therapies can diminish quality of life; therefore, it is imperative to identify those with true recurrence who may benefit from additional treatment. We aim to assess the relationship between MRP and overall survival to establish the role of MRP as a clinical decision-making tool as well as a prognostic assessment tool. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of adult patients with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of HGG and who have had at least one post-treatment MRP scan between January 2011 and April 2014 was conducted. MRP studies were interpreted by experienced radiologists based on relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) colour maps. Survival data was collected from medical records and obituary databases. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (mean age 56 years) with HGG (18 grade III, 43 grade IV) were included in the analysis. An increased survival benefit was observed in patients with negative MRP (median survival = 10 months) compared to those with positive MRP (median survival = 5 months), [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.51; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09 to 5.76; p = 0.03]. The adjusted analysis including all pre-selected variables demonstrated a similar relationship between MRP and overall survival [HR = 2.53; 95% CI: 1.05 to 6.14; p = 0.04]. Other independent predictors did not demonstrate a statistically significant association with overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a positive MRP result may signify the presence of highly active tumour and thus significantly lower overall survival. This implicates a prognostic role for the use of serial MRP studies to identify a time point in which tumour recurrence becomes highly aggressive, which can affect treatment determination and, more importantly, aid in clinical decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207