MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551750675 · doi:10.1115/ipc2016-64659

The Influence of the Bourdon Effect on Pipe Elbow

2016· article· en· W2551750675 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring and Maintenance; Materials and Joining · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Structural Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal pressureBend radiusStructural engineeringBending momentThrustElbowBendingFlexibility (engineering)Stress (linguistics)StiffnessEngineeringRADIUSCylinder stressMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringMechanical engineeringFinite element methodComposite materialMathematicsAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pipe elbows are frequently used in a pipeline system to change the directions. Thermal expansion and internal pressure results in bending moments on the bends causing ovalization of the initial circular cross-section. The ability of the bend to ovalize will result in an increase in the bend flexibility when compared to straight pipes [1]. In case of bends subjected to internal pressure, the pipe will start to straighten out due to the difference between the intrados and extrados surface areas. The internal pressure causes unbalanced thrust forces tending to open up the elbow depending on its stiffness and surrounding constraints. These forces tending to cause ovalization of the cross section and causing the tendency of pipe bends to open up are termed the “Bourdon effect”. If these unbalanced thrust forces are not taken into consideration, unanticipated deformations and high stress levels could occur at the elbow location that may not be accounted for in traditional stress analysis [2]. A better understanding of the influence of the Bourdon effect on the elbow design parameters is required. Past studies have investigated the behaviour of pipe elbows under closing bending moment and proposed factors that account for the increased flexibility and high stress levels resulted from ovalization. These factors are used in the current design codes [3],[4] &[5] and known as the flexibility factor and stress intensification factor. In this investigation, pipe elbows with different nominal pipe size and various bend radiuses to internal pipe radius ratios (R/r) are studied to get a better understanding of the Bourdon effect and its influence on the pipe stresses and deformations. Differential equilibrium equations are solved to derive a mathematical model to evaluate the unbalanced thrust forces resulted from the Bourdon effect on a pipe elbow. The forces evaluated from the derived model are compared to finite element model results and showed excellent agreement. A comparison between the CSA-Z662 code and the FEA results is conducted to investigate the applicability of the stress intensification factors used in the current design code for different loading cases. The study showed that the external bending moment direction acting on the pipe has a significant effect on the distribution of stresses on the pipe elbow and significantly depending on the level of applied internal pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it