MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551835371 · doi:10.1155/2016/9816494

Hemodynamic Response to Upper Airway Obstruction in Hypertensive and Normotensive Pregnant Women

2016· article· en· W2551835371 on OpenAlexafffund
John Reid, Riley A. Glew, Joe Mink, John Gjevre, Mark Fenton, Robert Skomro, Femi Olatunbosun

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Respiratory Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSaskatchewan Health Research FoundationUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsMedicineHemodynamicsAirwayAirway obstructionCardiologyInternal medicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Mild obstructive sleep apnea is common in pregnancy and may have an exacerbating role in gestational hypertension, although currently the interaction between these two diseases is uncertain. Methods. We analyzed 43 pregnant subjects, 28 with gestational hypertension (GH) and 15 with normal healthy pregnancy, by level I polysomnography. Additionally, diastolic and systolic blood pressure changes in response to obstructive respiratory events were measured by noninvasive beat-by-beat monitoring. We also assessed a subgroup (<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">27</mml:mn></mml:math>) of women with respiratory disturbance indexes &lt;5, for blood pressure responses to very subtle obstructive respiratory disturbances (“airflow reductions”). Results. The mean ± standard deviation respiratory disturbance index of our 28 GH women and 15 healthy pregnant women was<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">10.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">9.9</mml:mn></mml:math> mmHg and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">3.8</mml:mn></mml:math> mmHg, respectively. Systolic and diastolic pressure responses to these events were<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">30.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">12.8</mml:mn></mml:math> mmHg and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">16.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">6.1</mml:mn></mml:math> mmHg for GH women and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">29.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">14.2</mml:mn></mml:math> mmHg and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M7"><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">14.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">7.7</mml:mn></mml:math> mmHg for healthy women. For the 27 women in whom we assessed for airflow reduction events, the hemodynamic responses were<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M8"><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">27.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">12.3</mml:mn></mml:math> mmHg systolic and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M9"><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">14.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">6.7</mml:mn></mml:math> mmHg diastolic. Interpretation. Upper airway obstructive events of any severity are associated with a substantial transient blood pressure response in both healthy pregnant and GH women. Whether or not these events have a clinically significant impact on women with GH remains uncertain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Respiratory JournalSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207