MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552070661 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2016.2628034

A Priority-Aware Truthful Mechanism for Supporting Multi-Class Delay-Sensitive Medical Packet Transmissions in E-Health Networks

2016· article· en· W2552070661 on OpenAlexafffund
Changyan Yi, Jun Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkNetwork packetBase stationQueueing theoryBody area networkDefault gatewayQuality of serviceGateway (web page)WirelessScheduling (production processes)Wireless networkTransmission (telecommunications)TelecommunicationsWireless sensor network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the design of priority-aware truthful mechanisms for multi-class delay-sensitive medical packet transmissions in electronic health (e-health) networks is studied. Unlike most of existing works, we focus on beyond wireless body area network (beyond-WBAN) communications, and consider the absolutely prioritized transmission scheduling as the realization of medical-grade quality of service, i.e., more critical medical packets have to always be transmitted prior to the ones with less emergency. In our model, medical packets arrive randomly at each WBAN-gateway (which ordinarily stands for one patient), and their beyond-WBAN transmission requests are reported to the network regulator (i.e., the base station) with different packet priorities which reflect their medical importance. The base station then dynamically manages the beyond-WBAN transmission service by formulating a multi-class multi-server priority queueing system. Taking into account the potential strategic behaviors from smart gateways, we design a truthful mechanism which can guarantee that all gateways will honestly report the actual priorities of their medical packets, while at the same time incentivize the base station to provide channel usages for e-health services. Theoretical analyses and simulation results examine the desired properties of our proposed mechanism, and demonstrate its feasibility and superiority compared to counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207