MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552074137

Dat is What the PM Said: A Quantitative Analysis of Prime Minister Chrétien's Pronunciation of English Voiced Dental Fricatives

2005· article· en· W2552074137 on OpenAlexaffabout
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic Variation and Morphology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPronunciationLinguisticsHumanitiesSociolinguisticsPrime ministerPhilosophyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sociolinguistic–variationist type analysis was applied to the pronunciation of the English voiced dental fricative // by one Francophone Canadian, Prime Minister Jean Chretien. Fricative []–realisations were favoured in an interview setting, and plosive [d]–realisations were favoured in formal speeches, attributable to difficulties associated with the task of reading aloud. []–realisations were favoured following fricatives, and [d]–realisations were favoured following voiceless but not voiced plosives; the latter result is proposed to be due to differences in intra–oral pressure. [d]–realisations were favoured preceding mid–high vowels, but []–realisations were favoured preceding /i/, explainable in terms of an articulatory effect that also produces affrication in Canadian–French /d/ preceding high–front vowels. Statistical analyses were conducted using GoldVarb and SPSS software. The latter allows for tests of the significance of individual factors and of factor group interactions. La prononciation de la fricative dentale voisee anglaise // chez un locuteur canadien francophone, le Premier ministre Jean Chretien, a ete soumise a une analyse variationniste sociolinguistique. Les realisations fricatives [] ont ete favorisees en contexte d'entrevue et les realisations plosives [d] dans les discours formels, ce qui peut etre attribue aux difficultes associees a la lecture a voix haute. Les realisations [] ont ete favorisees apres des fricatives et les realisations [d] ont ete favorisees apres des occlusives sourdes, mais non voisees; nous proposons que ce dernier resultat est relie a la pression intra–buccale. Les realisations [d] ont ete favorisees devant les voyelles mi-hautes, alors que les realisations [] ont ete favorisees devant /i/, ce qui peut etre explique par un effet articulatoire qui produit egalement l’affrication en francais canadien de /d/ devant les voyelles anterieures hautes. Des analyses statistiques ont ete realisees avec les logiciels GoldVarb et SPSS, ce dernier permettant de tester la significativite des facteurs individuels et des interactions entre groupes de facteurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLinguistic Variation and MorphologyFrench-language works237,207