MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552259367 · doi:10.13140/2.1.3923.4880

The First Italian Experience of Ground Thermal Energy Storage: an Integrated Approach for Design and Monitoring, from Laboratory to Field Scale

2015· article· en· W2552259367 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicoló Giordano, Cesare Comina, Giuseppe Mandrone

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)Reliability (semiconductor)Field (mathematics)PlumeEnvironmental scienceThermal energy storageEngineeringCivil engineeringReliability engineeringMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ground thermal energy storage (GTES) is a useful application able to provide the H&C and DHW demand of commercial or residential buildings. Several examples in Canada and Northern Europe demonstrated the reliability and convenience of these systems in terms of both energy and economic savings, even though a remarkable initial investment is required. Owing to these conspicuous costs, an accurate preliminary study should be undertaken in order to correctly design the plant and achieve good efficiency of the system. Moreover, when the plant is operative, the monitoring of the thermal plume induced in the undisturbed ground should be a priority. The surrounding litho, hydro and biosphere are indeed influenced by the plant’s activity and a trustworthy supervision of the temperature field is advisable both for the environmental safety and for controlling the system’s efficiency. For these purposes, an integrated approach for design and monitoring GTES systems was tested first at laboratory scale and then applied to a field scale living lab, located nearby Torino (Northern Italy). The proposed methodology consists in lab analogical modeling of the heat propagation, geophysical measurements exploiting the existing relationship between temperature and electrical resistivity and numerical simulations of the studied phenomena with an open-source software (OpenGeoSys). The joint effort of temperature monitoring and numerical simulation at both lab and site scale, combined with direct measurements of the thermal properties, can be a useful tool for highlighting the best design solution for a GTES system. Moreover electrical resistivity surveys, calibrated at lab scale and then conducted at field scale, can be very useful in imaging the Thermal Affected Zone generated by the plant. The adopted approach showed a good potential towards reliable design and accurate monitoring activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207