Lupus Myocarditis: Initial Presentation and Longterm Outcomes in a Multicentric Series of 29 Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cardiac involvement during systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may include the pericardium, myocardium, valvular tissue, and coronary arteries. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical, biological, and radiological presentation of lupus myocarditis (LM) as well as the treatment response and longterm outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a multicentric retrospective study of LM from January 2000 to May 2014. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (3 men and 26 women) fulfilled the inclusion criteria (median age at the diagnosis of SLE: 30 yrs, range 16-57). Myocarditis was the first sign of SLE in 17/29 cases (58.6%). Troponin was elevated in 20/25 cases. Electrocardiogram results were abnormal in 25/28 cases. Echocardiography revealed low (≤ 45%) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 19/29, 66%) and pericardium effusion (20/29, 69%). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed delayed gadolinium enhancement in 9/13 patients (69%). Patients were treated with corticosteroids (n = 28), cyclophosphamide (CYC; n = 16), intravenous immunoglobulins (n = 8), and/or mycophenolate mofetil (n = 2). The median followup was 37 months. One month after the beginning of the treatment, 10/23 patients (43%) who had undergone echocardiography had an LVEF ≥ 55%. At the end of followup, 21/26 patients (81%) exhibited an LVEF ≥ 55%. Three patients died during followup, and 2 died from LM. CONCLUSION: LM is a severe manifestation of SLE. It can be the first manifestation of the disease or it can occur during followup, in particular in untreated patients. However, the longterm prognosis is typically positive. Patients with less severe disease exhibited good LVEF recovery without CYC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".