MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552407563

Governing the Sulphur Dioxide Emissions of Multinational Corporations: Putting the Breaks on the Race-to-the-Bottom

2010· article· en· W2552407563 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Maren Zimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueDalhousie journal of legal studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Trade Organization Law
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRace to the bottomMultinational corporationHarmGreenhouse gasRace to the TopRace (biology)Global warmingCorporate governanceEnvironmental lawState responsibilityPoliticsPolitical scienceBusinessLawClimate changeInternational lawSociologyGlobalizationEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multinational corporations are now part of global politics. For effective governance of international environmental problems, their roles in the political process cannot be ignored. This paper will examine “race-to-the-bottom” theory and evaluate whether this race has occurred as a reaction to sulphur dioxide (SO2) regulation, resulting in a need for increased global governance surrounding environmental issues. The paper focuses on SO2 because the Trail Smelter case, which is seen as the birth case for international environmental law, recognized the harm stemming from this pollutant in 1941; scientific evidence has also linked SO2 emissions to acid rain and respiratory problems associated with smog, and advancements have been made in regulating the compound. However, despite the advancements that have been made in regulating SO2 pollution in Canada and in other developed nations, global SO2 emissions have risen. Given the academic support for the race-to-the-bottom theory, the global nature of multinationals, and transboundary harm resulting from air pollution, a new international structure is needed – one that looks at environmental problems from an issue-level, and one that includes multinational corporations in relevant decision-making processes. This topic is timely given the complex questions that surround environmental regulation of multinational corporations when dealing with air pollution. Given the state of scientific knowledge about the movement of air pollution and the harm stemming from compounds released into the air, it is imperative that this issue be examined. Specifically, the increasing importance of the regulation of greenhouse gases associated with global climate change necessitates such a study. The race-to-the-bottom associated with SO2 and the ineffectiveness of multinational regulation at the global level highlight the need to rethink future global atmospheric policy. The paper will begin with a case study on SO2 that explores the history and regulation of the compound. I will examine regulation at the international and domestic levels, and then explore how global smelting operations and SO2 emissions have shifted into the developing world. My evidence weakly indicates a shift, but does show that global emissions have not decreased despite increased regulation. I will then discuss the race-to-the-bottom theory, environmental regulation in general, and new international approaches to the problem. In conclusion, I propose that environmental regulation needs to occur at the global level and from an issue perspective. In order to be effective, this decision-making process should include various stakeholders, including multinational corporations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalhousie journal of legal studiesSame topicWorld Trade Organization LawFrench-language works237,207