MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2552685101 · doi:10.2527/jam2016-1306

1306 Feeding steers extruded flaxseed and hay in a total mixed ration or sequentially can have substantial effects on beef fat polyunsaturated fatty acids and biohydrogenation intermediates

2016· article· en· W2552685101 on OpenAlexaffabout
Payam Vahmani, D. C. Rolland, Tim A. McAllister, H. C. Block, Spencer D. Proctor, Le Luo Guan, N. Prieto, J.L. Aalhus, M. E. R. Dugan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaLethbridge CollegeAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHayPolyunsaturated fatty acidFood scienceChemistryBeef cattleAnimal scienceFatty acidBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been growing interest in increasing the content of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA; esp. α-linolenic acid, ALA) and their biohydrogenation intermediates (BHI) in beef, particularly trans 11–18:1 (VA, vaccenic acid) and cis 9, trans 11–18:2 (RA, rumenic acid) due to their potential positive health effects. However, high variability in PUFA and BHI have been found in beef between and within trials. The present trial was designed to determine if feeding steers extruded flaxseed (Linpro-R™; O&T Farms Ltd., SK, Canada) and hay (25% and 75%; DM basis) together as a total mixed ration (TMR), or sequentially (non-TMR) would result in different enrichments of PUFA and BHI in different beef adipose tissues. Forty-eight Continental crossbred steers (325 ± 16 kg SD) were stratified by weight to 6 pens of 8 steers, pens were randomized to either TMR or non-TMR and steers were fed ad libitum for 240 d. At slaughter, subcutaneous fat (SCF) and perineal fat (PRF) samples were collected, freeze dried and directly methylated with 0.5 M sodium methoxide, and analyzed by GC using a 100 m CPSil 88 capillary column. Data were analyzed as a one-way ANOVA using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS with diet as the main factor and pen as the experimental unit. Treatment means were generated and separated using the LSMEANS and PDIFF options, respectively. Compared to TMR steers, non-TMR steers had greater proportions of PUFA, trans-18:1, conjugated linoleic acids, and conjugated linolenic acids in both SC (+9.7%, +9.8%, +43.4%, +63.7%) and PR (+14.1%, +10.5%, +52.9%, +75.6%). In SCF, the percentages of ALA, VA and RA were increased (P < 0.001) from 0.91%, 4.92% and 1.91% in TMR steers to 1.10%, 6.82% and 2.69% in non-TMR steers. In PRF, the percentages of ALA, VA and RA were increased (P < 0.001) from 0.89%, 7.29% and 0.72% in TMR steers to 1.06%, 10.32% and 1.13% in non-TMR steers. Our results suggest that the method of feeding PUFA sources (e.g., flaxseed) can profoundly affect the enrichment of PUFA and their BHI in beef fat. In addition, the enrichment of these fatty acids also depends on fat depot, with PRF having greater proportions of VA, while SCF being higher in RA, which is likely due to the greater delta-9 desaturation of VA to RA in SCF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicFatty Acid Research and Health→French-language works237,207→