Synthesis and Evaluation of 1,2,3‐Triazole‐Containing Vinyl and Allyl Sulfones as Anti‐Trypanosomal Agents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An approach is described to access 1,2,3‐triazole‐derived peptidyl vinyl sulfones as Trypanosoma brucei brucei inhibitors by using click chemistry, starting from a common azide intermediate. Among the triazole analogues, biotinylated inhibitors 11 and 12 offer possibilities as probes for the elucidation of target proteases for this compound class. The development of two syntheses of a 1,2,3‐triazole‐based vinyl sulfone 5 are also presented. This compound was accessed through a click reaction of a lysine‐derived azide (itself accessed by diazo transfer), and a phenylalanine‐derived alkyne synthesised by both Ohira–Bestmann and Corey–Fuchs‐based alkynylation protocols. Several members of this family of compounds showed promising anti‐trypanosomal activity. Unexpectedly, one of the most active compounds was allyl sulfone 24, which stems from the isomerisation of vinyl sulfone 5, and is presumably a reversible inhibitor. A docking study of the analogues in the active site of the parasitic cysteine protease rhodesain was carried out in order to gain an insight into their likely interactions with these enzymes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".