MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552752196 · doi:10.2527/jam2016-0469

0469 Use of low-cost, non-nutritive adsorbents as intestinal binding agents to sequester the boar taint compound androstenone

2016· article· en· W2552752196 on OpenAlexaff
P. Park, I. B. Mandell, C. F. M. de Lange, J. Squires

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndrostenoneSkatoleBoar taintFood scienceIngestionChemistryAnimal scienceBiologyEndocrinologyBiochemistryIndole test

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boar taint is an unpleasant odor and taste detected from pork of some intact males when cooked, caused by high accumulation of the testicular steroid androstenone and the indole skatole. Currently available research exploring dietary approaches to control androstenone is scarce. The objective of this study was to evaluate for the efficacy of binding agents in vivo against androstenone and its impacts on performance in intact male pigs, following up on previous works in vitro. The study aims to capitalize on a hormone-recycling phenomenon which takes place in the gastrointestinal tract of animals, called enterohepatic circulation. Four adsorbents have been assessed for their binding effectiveness against androstenone in our laboratory; these were previously used in studies which successfully mitigated negative effects associated with mycotoxin ingestion in production animals. All additives bound androstenone in high efficacies in vitro, which warranted evaluation of the effectiveness of these binders in swine diets to reduce its levels in plasma and fat. Ninety (n = 90) purebred Duroc boars (123 ± 6 d of age at start of experiment) were equally allocated (n = 18) and fed 1 of 4 diets added with 2% bentonite (BNT), 3.5% diatomaceous earth (DE), 15% spent filter aid (SFA), or 0.7% hydrated sodium-calcium aluminosilicate (HSCAS) for at least 28 d followed by 14 d of recovery. All groups were compared with a control entire male group (n = 18) fed a typical corn-soybean meal finisher diet. Plasma samples and backfat biopsies were collected at d 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 of trial. Pigs were weighed weekly and calculated for growth performance parameters. Estrone-1-sulfate in plasma was analyzed as a positive control for enterohepatic circulation. Analysis of trends during the treatment period were performed using the PROC MIXED repeated measures procedure in SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). There were no differences in ADG, ADFI, or FCR across diets (P > 0.05) throughout the treatment period. In addition, there were no significant decreases in backfat or plasma androstenone and estrone-1-sulfate across pigs fed treatment diets by d 28 (P > 0.05). However, there was a wide variation in plasma and fat androstenone concentration, which may result from the process of transporting the pigs into a novel environment and mixing. Further research using of crossbred pigs that will not be mixed and/or transported into unfamiliar groups is needed to conclusively evaluate the efficacy of these treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207