MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552843539 · doi:10.1002/ldr.2664

Long‐Term Grazing Alters Soil Trace Gas Fluxes from Grasslands in the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, Canada

2016· article· en· W2552843539 on OpenAlex
Xinlei Gao, Ben W. Thomas, Ryan Beck, D. J. Thompson, Mengli Zhao, Walter D. Willms, Xiying Hao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueLand Degradation and Development · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsGrazingGrasslandEnvironmental scienceSoil waterAgronomyGrowing seasonSoil scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Long‐term cattle grazing may degrade grassland soils, but how soil CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes respond to long‐term cattle grazing is poorly understood. Therefore, we quantified soil CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes in response to four levels (none, light, heavy, very heavy) of long‐term (>65 years) cattle grazing on a rough fescue grassland in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, Canada over three grazing seasons. The grazed grassland soils emitted 37 to 51% more CO 2 than non‐grazed soils. Grazed grassland soils were small CH 4 sinks and small N 2 O sources each season, and their cumulative fluxes were significantly affected by a cattle stocking rate × year interaction, indicating the grazing effect was influenced by environmental conditions. Soil CH 4 uptake was negatively correlated with soil moisture ( r = −0·59). The 2013 grazing season had about 41% greater precipitation than average and grazing significantly decreased CH 4 uptake 31 to 38% compared with non‐grazed soils. The N 2 O emissions were 122 to 179% greater with heavy and very heavy grazing than none in the wet season, unaffected by grazing in the normal precipitation season and 72% lower with light grazing than none in the dry season. Predicting trace gas fluxes from grazed grassland soils across space and time is difficult because of interactions among weather conditions, edaphic properties and grazing intensity. However, long‐term cattle grazing increased soil CO 2 fluxes, while the grazing effect on CH 4 uptake depended on precipitation and the soil N 2 O flux responded as a function of grazing intensity and precipitation. © 2016 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Land Degradation & Development Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it