Venisti tandem: Johannes de Laet y la articulación del imaginario geográfico holandés sobre el Caribe, 1625-1641
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beginning in the last decade of the 16th century, the Dutch Republic and its mercantile enterprises were fundamental in linking the Caribbean to the emerging global capitalist system. Using notions rooted in conceptual historiography and critical geography, the article examines the notion of the Caribbean region developed by the Dutch during the second quarter of the 17 th century. The article focuses on History of the New World (Nieuwe Wereldt ofte Beschrijvinghe van West-Indien) by Johannes de Laet, a pivot text that articulated the Dutch claim over the American hemisphere, configured an imaginary about the Caribbean region, and imbricated the area within the commercial and maritime expansion of the United Provinces. History of the New World congealed geographical notions about the region with the emergent doctrines of free commerce and free navigation, all within the incipient rationalist thought of the period. In a juncture in which the Caribbean was acquiring importance for North European countries, the text represented the region as a middle hemispheric space located in the emerging Atlantic frontier; an area of natural exuberance, enormous commercial potential, and open to Dutch possession.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".