MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2553418162 · doi:10.1039/c6ob02278b

Boronic esters as protective groups in carbohydrate chemistry: processes for acylation, silylation and alkylation of glycoside-derived boronates

2016· article· en· W2553418162 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic & Biomolecular Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Public Health
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceCanada Foundation for InnovationMcLean Foundation
KeywordsChemistrySilylationAcylationPhenylboronic acidBoronic acidAlkylationOrganic chemistryProtecting groupBorylationGlycosideEtherCatalysisAryl

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Procedures for selective installation of acyl, silyl ether and para-methoxybenzyl (PMB) ether groups to glycoside substrates have been developed, employing phenylboronic esters as protected intermediates. The sequence of boronic ester formation, functionalization and deprotection can be accomplished with only a single purification step, and the boronic acid component can be recovered and reused after deprotection. Key advances include the identification of reaction conditions for installation of PMB groups in the presence of boronic esters, and the use of the 'phase switching' protocol developed by Hall and co-workers as an efficient method for boronic ester cleavage. The relatively mild conditions for boronate deprotection are tolerant of several functional groups, including esters, silyl ethers, ketals and thioglycosides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it