La metafisica di trascendenza come saturazione dell'orizzonte fenomenologico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a widely used technique for studying diffusion in biological tissues. Most of the existing approaches for the analysis of FRAP experiments assume isotropic diffusion, while only a few account for anisotropic diffusion. In fibrous tissues, such as articular cartilage, tendons and ligaments, diffusion, the main mechanism for molecular transport, is anisotropic and depends on the fibre alignment. In this work, we solve the general diffusion equation governing a FRAP test, assuming an anisotropic diffusivity tensor and using a general initial condition for the case of an elliptical (thereby including the case of a circular) bleaching profile. We introduce a closed-form solution in the spatial coordinates, which can be applied directly to FRAP tests to extract the diffusivity tensor. We validate the approach by measuring the diffusivity tensor of [Formula: see text] FITC-Dextran in porcine medial collateral ligaments. The measured diffusion anisotropy was [Formula: see text] (SE), which is in agreement with that reported in the literature. The limitations of the approach, such as the size of the bleached region and the intensity of the bleaching, are studied using COMSOL simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".