MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Ex Vivo Gene Therapy for Haemophilia A: FVIII-Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Fail To Produce Sustained Therapeutic Levels of Circulating FVIII In Vivo.

2006· article· en· W2553559912 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel L. Coutu, Moïra François, Jessica Cuerquis, Hideto Matsui, David Lillicrap, Jacques Galipeau

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEx vivoMesenchymal stem cellGenetic enhancementStromal cellImmunologyMedicineBone marrowIn vivoCancer researchProgenitor cellCell therapyStem cellBiologyPathologyCell biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The use of ex vivo transfected autologous fibroblasts was explored for the delivery of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) to treat haemophilia A patients, albeit with mitigated results (Roth et al., NEJM 2001). A limiting factor to this approach is the limited expansion potential of somatic cells and cellular dose manufactured for therapeutic use. The use of adult stem or progenitor cells offers a possible remedy to this specific challenge because of their high proliferative capacities, allowing the generation of large number of cells ex vivo. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) can easily be isolated by bone marrow aspiration and extensively expanded ex vivo using standard tissue culture procedures. They also possess endogenous wound healing properties and are relatively easy to gene engineer. When engineered to secrete therapeutic plasma-soluble proteins, they could be injected with a supporting matrix - as a subcutaneous plug - and used to treat a variety of haematological disorders responsive to secreted proteins such as haemophilia A and B and anaemia for instance. The retrievability of the implanted cells is desirable if unexpected side effects were to occur. The aim of this project was to test a gene engineered MSC platform to treat a clinically relevant model disease, haemophilia A. Canine MSCs (cMSCs) isolated from normal and haemophilia A dogs were genetically modified using a 3rd generation lentiviral vector carrying the B-domain deleted canine FVIII (cFVIII) gene. In vitro production of cFVIII was assessed by ELISA and found to be about 2,4 U/106 cells/24h. 107 of those cells were injected intraperitoneally in NOD-SCID mice and transient expression (8–10 days) of therapeutic levels of cFVIII (up to 10%) could be detected using an ELISA capable of discriminating cFVIII from murine FVIII. However, when these cells were embedded in an injectable human compatible collagen based scaffolding material (Contigen) and implanted subcutaneously into NOD-SCID mice no cFVIII could be detected above background in any animals. Because we previously demonstrated that erythropoietin gene-modified MSCs implanted as described led to an increase in hematocrit for an extended period (Eliopoulos et al. Mol Ther 2004), we believe that the failure of the present approach is attributable to idiosyncrasies of the FVIII system. Of particular relevance is the requirement for the presence of von Willebrand factor (vWF) in stabilizing the FVIII protein and protect it from degradation. We already have evidence that ex vivo transduced endothelial progenitor cells known to produce endogenous vWF can serve as better delivery vehicles for FVIII as part of a matrix embedded subcutaneous plug and lead to prolonged circulating levels of FVIII in mice (Matsui et al., submitted). These data support the hypothesis that FVIII delivery by engineered somatic and stem cells likely requires co-expression of key cofactors, such as vWF, for durable and clinically relevant effects in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemophilia Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→