MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2553653853 · doi:10.1016/j.artres.2016.08.036

PO-33 STATIN THERAPY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS MAY IMPROVE ARTERIAL STIFFNESS IN WOMEN BUT NOT IN MEN: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS

2016· article· en· W2553653853 on OpenAlexaff
Yessica-Haydee Gomez, Shubhabrata Das, Jessica Gorgui, Inés Colmegna, Stella S. Daskalopoulou

Bibliographic record

VenueArtery Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRheumatoid arthritisArterial stiffnessInternal medicineStatinPhysical therapyCardiologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Statins have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, thereby reducing cardiovascular risk. Arterial stiffness is a composite indicator of cardiovascular health and a predictor of cardiovascular risk. We assessed the effect of statin therapy on arterial stiffness and hemodynamics in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: A prospective cohort study including adults with rheumatoid arthritis and an indication for statin therapy (cases) or not (controls) is being conducted. Peripheral systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured by BpTRU. Arterial stiffness (carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity [cfPWV] and carotid-to-radial PWV), central systolic and diastolic blood pressures, mean arterial pressure, and augmentation index corrected for 75 bpm were obtained non-invasively (SphygmoCor, AtCor, Australia). All measurements were performed prior to statin initiation and at 6-month post-treatment. Independent t-tests evaluated differences in changes between groups. Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) measurements were also performed. Results: To date, 14 subjects (mean age 61.4±9.5 years, 9 females), have completed the study. All cases achieved recommended lipid level targets by 6 months. There were no statistical differences in patient characteristics (beyond lipid levels) at baseline or 6-months between cases and controls among the whole cohort. In sex-specific analyses, statin therapy was associated with a significant decrease in cfPWV in women taking statins compared to women in the control group (–0.71±0.18 m/s vs +0.96±1.13 m/s, respectively; p<0.05), which was not observed in men. No other associations were observed. cIMT analyses are underway. Conclusion: Our preliminary results suggest that in women with rheumatoid arthritis, statin therapy may reduce cfPWV, a predictive marker of cardiovascular disease and events, which was not observed in men. Whether sex differences in the effect of statin on arterial stiffness are sustained with a larger sample size of rheumatoid arthritis patients will be addressed in our ongoing study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtery ResearchSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207