MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2553831955 · doi:10.2527/jam2016-0704

0704 Thermal stability of microfiltered and ultrafiltered retentates

2016· article· en· W2553831955 on OpenAlexaff
Isis Rodrigues Toledo Renhe, Milena Corredig

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiafiltrationMicrofiltrationUltrafiltration (renal)ChemistryChromatographyPasteurizationWhey proteinMembraneCoagulationLactoseFood scienceBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Membrane filtration technologies are widespread unit operations in the dairy industry and are often used to obtain ingredients of tailored processing functionalities. The objective of this work was to better understand the effect of partial removal of whey proteins by microfiltration (MF) on the heat stability of the retentates. Control retentates were obtained using ultrafiltration (UF). Pasteurized milk was microfiltered (80 kDa polysulfone membrane) or ultrafiltered (30 kDa cellulose membrane) in a plate and frame membrane system to reach two and four times concentration (based on volume reduction). Concentrates showed no differences in pH, casein micelle size, or minerals in the serum phase, before heating, as diafiltration was not used in this study. The reduced amount of whey protein in the MF retentates caused a significant increase in the heat stability of the retentates, compared with UF retentates. This difference was not due to ionic composition differences or to pH. Heat coagulation time decreased with protein concentration but significantly increased in MF retentates, containing less whey proteins than the corresponding UF controls. In 2x concentrates, retentates prepared with MF, containing 20% less whey proteins than UF control, showed an increase in the heat coagulation time of about 11 min. 4xMF retentates contained 17 ± 3 mg/mL of whey proteins, about 40% less whey proteins than the 4xUF control retentates. A 4x concentrate prepared by MF showed heat stability statistically similar to that of a 2xUF concentrates, with a heat coagulation time of about 38 min. The turbidity parameter 1/l*, measured by diffusing wave spectroscopy, increased after heating, with the UF retentates showing a higher value than the MF retentates, at the same protein concentration. In addition, 4xMF concentrates showed a 1/l* value comparable to that of 2xUF concentrates. In conclusion, this work demonstrated that partial removal of whey proteins by MF could be used as a means to increase heat stability of milk concentrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsFrench-language works237,207