Investigation of Crack Propagation Characteristics Using Instrumented Charpy and DWT Tests for Full-Scale Burst Tested 1219 mm OD Grade 550 (X80) Linepipe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TransCanada, on behalf of the Coastal GasLink (CGL) project, has carried out two full-scale burst tests [1, 2] at the Spadeadam test site of DNV GL, to validate the effectiveness of crack arrestors and refine the propagation control design for the large-diameter, X80 linepipe required for this project. The tests were supported by LNG Canada and TransCanada Technology Management Program. For these full-scale burst tests, Grade 550linepipe having Charpy energies from 125 to over 450 J were produced using thermomechanical controlled processing (TMCP) technology. This paper describes propagation and arrest properties of the X80 linepipe materials having various Charpy energy values from the aspect of crack propagation energy and crack propagation speed relationships from instrumented Charpy and press-notched (PN) and static pre-cracked drop-weight tear (SPC-DWT) tests, together with in-situ observation of crack propagation by high-speed video camera. It was found that crack propagation speed is greatly affected by crack propagation energy measured by both Charpy and instrumented DWT tests. The crack propagation energy is lower in DWTT specimens with a higher separation index. It is not clear whether the crack propagation energy is only affected by the separations. However, the crack velocity is higher in DWTT specimens with a higher separation index. It is assumed that the crack propagation speed might be not only affected by separation but also low propagation energy. The testing data obtained from Charpy and instrumented DWT tests are compared with the fracture speed data measured from the full-scale burst test. The correlation between Charpy energy and crack propagation energy in DWTT is also compared with the predictions of an empirical equation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".