MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2554085568 · doi:10.2527/jam2016-0480

0480 The effects of partial replacement of barley starch with lactose on production and ruminal fermentation characteristics in dairy cows

2016· article· en· W2554085568 on OpenAlexaff
E. De Seram, G.B. Penner, T. Mutsvangwa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin squareLactoseStarchFood scienceChemistryFermentationComposition (language)Animal scienceRumenBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies have reported improved DMI and milk production when dietary starch was replaced with sugars in corn-based diets, but there is limited work with barley-based diets. Because corn and barley starch differ in their rates and extents of ruminal degradation, it is important to determine if replacement of barley starch with sugars is beneficial as has been reported for corn. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of partial replacement of barley starch with lactose (as dried whey permeate; DWP) on DMI, milk yield and composition, and ruminal fermentation characteristics. Eight lactating Holstein cows (97 ± 10 d-in-milk; 733 ± 63 kg BW) were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design experiment with four dietary treatments. Experimental periods consisted of 18 d of adaptation and 10 d of measurements. Four cows in one Latin square were ruminally cannulated. Cows were fed a barley-based diet (3.6% total sugar [TS]; control), or diets that contained 6.6, 9.6 or 12.6% TS on a DM basis. Dietary TS content was increased by the replacement of barley grain with DWP, which contained 83% lactose. Diets were isonitrogenous (17.2% CP) and starch contents of the control, 6.6, 9.6, and 12.6% TS diets were 24.3, 22.2, 21.2 and 19.1%, respectively. The inclusion of DWP did not affect DMI (mean = 26.6 kg/d) and milk yield (34.3, 35.0, 35.6, and 34.6 kg/d for the control, 6.6, 9.6, and 12.6% TS diets, respectively); however, milk lactose content tended to increase quadratically (P = 0.07) as TS content increased. There was a linear decrease (P = 0.03) in ruminal NH3–N concentrations as TS content increased. Ruminal pH tended to decrease linearly as TS content increased (P = 0.06; 6.32, 6.31, 6.34, and 6.22 for the control, 6.6, 9.6, and 12.6% TS diets, respectively). Total ruminal VFA concentrations were not affected (P > 0.05) by diet; however, there was a linear increase (P = 0.04) in butyrate concentration as TS content increased. Plasma urea-nitrogen concentrations were not affected by diet, but milk urea-nitrogen concentrations tended to change in a cubic manner as TS content increased (P = 0.08; 14.1, 15.1, 14.0, and 13.7 mg/dL for control, 6.6, 9.6, and 12.6% TS diets, respectively). These results suggest that partial replacement of barley starch with lactose improves ruminal N efficiency by decreasing ruminal NH3–N concentration, but production performance was unaffected

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology→French-language works237,207→