MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554088529 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.3532

Penile metastasis from primary transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder sparing the urethra

2016· article· en· W2554088529 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Justin D. Oake, Douglas N. Drover

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenital Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPenectomyMedicinePenisGlans penisCystoscopyUrethraCorpus SpongiosumTransitional cell carcinomaUrologyMetastasisMalignancySurgeryBladder cancerPathologyAnatomyCancerUrinary systemPenile cancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metastatic involvement of the penis is relatively infrequent. Metastasis of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) is extremely rare. We report a case of bladder TCC with metastases to the penis that spares the urethra - a finding that, to the best of our knowledge, has not been previously reported. Of the documented mechanisms of metastatic transmission to the penis, we suspect the cause was retrograde lymphatic spread. In our case, a 59-year-old male presented to our clinic initially with phimosis and later developed gross hematuria. Subsequent cystoscopy noted the appearance of tumour extending into the prostate, as well as the appearance of extensive TCC throughout the bladder. Following transurethral resection of prostate and bladder tissue, which demonstrated high-grade urothelial carcinoma, the patient underwent a radical cystoprostatectomy. A year later, he developed worsening gross hematuria and we noted the appearance of primary penile squamous cell malignancy. He then underwent a partial penectomy. The histopathology evaluation result from the partial penectomy revealed infiltration of TCC in the glans penis, as well as invasion into the corpus spongiosum, with sparing of the urethra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicGenital Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207