MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554182198 · doi:10.1115/ipc2016-64626

Update of Understanding of Near-Neutral pH SCC Crack Growth Mechanisms and Development of Pipe-Online Software for Pipeline Integrity Management

2016· article· en· W2554182198 on OpenAlexaff
Weixing Chen, Jiaxi Zhao, Jenny Been, Karina Chevil, Greg Van Boven, Sean Keane

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
Canadian institutionsSpectra Energy (Canada)TransCanada (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress corrosion crackingCoalescence (physics)Crack closureMaterials scienceCorrosionPipeline transportStress fieldCrackingFracture mechanicsParis' lawPipeline (software)Structural engineeringForensic engineeringMetallurgyEngineeringComposite materialMechanical engineeringFinite element methodPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is aimed to introduce Pipe-Online Software that has been developed recently for crack growth and remaining service life prediction for pipelines experiencing near-neutral pH stress corrosion cracking and corrosion fatigue. The software was developed based on the latest understanding of the physical, chemical and mechanical processes involved during crack initiation, early crack growth and coalescence, and stage II crack growth. In each stage of cracking, governing equations were established based on extensive experimental simulations under realistic conditions found during pipeline operation in the field and vast amounts of field data collected, which include pipeline steel properties, crack geometries, field environmental conditions, Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) data of oil and gas pipelines. The model has considered a wide range of conditions that could lead to the crack initiation, crack dormancy and crack transition from a dormant state to active growth. It is concluded that the premature rupture caused by stress cracking at a service life of about 20–30 years commonly found during field operation could take place only when all the worst conditions responsible for crack initiation and growth have been realized concurrently at the site of rupture. This also explains the reason why over 95% of near-neutral pH cracks remain harmless, while about 1% of them become a threat to the integrity of pipeline steels. It has been found that crack initiation and early stage crack growth are primarily caused by the direct dissolution of steels at constrained areas. The rate of dissolution can be high at the pipe surface because of various galvanic effects, but decreases to a low value as the cracks approach a depth of ∼ 1.0 mm, leading to a state of dormancy as generally observed in the field. In stage II crack growth, the software has considered loading interactions occurring during oil and gas pipeline operations with underload-type variable pressure fluctuations. The software has provided predicted lifetimes that are comparable to the actual service lives found in the field. This forms a sharp contrast with the predictions made by existing methods that are generally conservative or inconsistent with the field observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metalsFrench-language works237,207