MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554218253 · doi:10.46298/dmtcs.2841

Equivalence Relations of Permutations Generated by Constrained Transpositions

2010· article· en· W2554218253 on OpenAlex
Stephen Linton, James Propp, Tom Roby, Julian West

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsFibonacci numberPermutation (music)Equivalence relationDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a large family of equivalence relations on permutations in $S_n$ that generalise those discovered by Knuth in his study of the Robinson-Schensted correspondence. In our most general setting, two permutations are equivalent if one can be obtained from the other by a sequence of pattern-replacing moves of prescribed form; however, we limit our focus to patterns where two elements are transposed, conditional upon the presence of a third element of suitable value and location. For some relations of this type, we compute the number of equivalence classes, determine how many $n$-permutations are equivalent to the identity permutation, or characterise this equivalence class. Although our results include familiar integer sequences (e.g., Catalan, Fibonacci, and Tribonacci numbers) and special classes of permutations (layered, connected, and $123$-avoiding), some of the sequences that arise appear to be new. Nous considérons une famille de relations d’équivalence sur l'ensemble $S_n$ des permutations, qui généralisent les relations de Knuth liées à la correspondance Robinson-Schensted. Dans notre contexte général, deux permutations sont considérées comme équivalentes si l'une peut être obtenue de l'autre auprès d'une séquence de remplacements d'un motif par un autre selon des règles précisées. Désormais, nous ne considérons dans l’œuvre actuelle que les motifs qui correspondent à la transposition de deux éléments, conditionné sur la présence d'un élément de valeur et de position approprié. Pour plusieurs exemples de ce problème, nous énumérons les classes d'équivalence, nous déterminons combien de permutations sur $n$ éléments sont équivalentes à l'identité, ou nous précisons la forme des éléments dans cette dernière classe. Bien que nos résultats retrouvent des séquences des entiers très bien connues (nombres de Catalan, de Fibonacci, de Tribonacci...) ainsi que des classes de permutations déjà étudiées (en couches, connexes, sans motif $123$), nous trouvons également des séquences qui paraissent être nouvelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it