MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554510170 · doi:10.2527/jam2016-1354

1354 Net choline absorption of abomasally infused choline and rumen-protected choline in the lactating dairy cow

2016· article· en· W2554510170 on OpenAlexaff
M.J. de Veth, Virginia M. Artegoitia, Shawn R. Campagna, H. Lapierre, Federico Harte, C.L. Girard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCholinePhosphocholineCholine chlorideChemistryPhosphatidylcholineMetabolismEndocrinologyInternal medicineAnimal scienceBiologyPhospholipidBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Choline metabolites have a critical role in many biological processes and choline supplementation to the peripaturient dairy cow improves hepatic lipid metabolism. However, variability in responses to choline supplementation has highlighted a lack of understanding of choline absorption and metabolism in the lactating dairy cow. Our objective was to estimate net choline absorption by measuring net portal fluxes of choline and choline metabolites in cows receiving either dietary supplements of rumen-protected choline (RPC) or abomasal infusion of choline (AIC). Five lactating Holstein cows (237 ± 17 DIM) were used in a 5 × 5 Latin Square design, with 5-d treatment periods and a 2-d interval between periods. Treatments were 1) control (0 g/d choline), 2) 12.5 g/d choline fed as RPC, 3) 25 g/d choline fed as RPC, 4) 12.5 g/d choline provided as AIC, 5) 25 g/d choline provided as AIC. Choline chloride (CC) was the choline form for both sources; RPC (Reashure, Balchem Corporation) and AIC (CC70, Balchem Corporation) contained 21.6% and 52.3% choline ion, respectively. Cows were fed every 2 h to minimize post-prandial variation. On the last day of each period 9 blood samples were collected simultaneously from an artery and portal vein at 30-min intervals and analyzed for betaine, free choline (Cho), lysophosphatidylcholine, phosphocholine and sphingomyelin, using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The net portal flux of Cho (control- 1.7 mmol/h) increased linearly (P < 0.001) with AIC (4.0 and 7.1 mmol/h for 12.5 and 25 g/d AIC, respectively) indicating that the net absorption of Cho was 54% (95% confidence interval of 30 to 79%). No relationship was found between dose of RPC and net portal flux of Cho (P = 0.52). Net portal fluxes of the choline metabolites were not altered by choline treatment. However, the plasma arterial concentrations of betaine and phosphocholine increased (P < 0.001) in response to AIC: 30.6, 102.7 and 151.2 μM and 3.47, 4.21 and 4.96 μM for control, 12.5 and 25 g/d. In addition, plasma arterial concentration of phosphocholine increased (P < 0.01) with RPC, averaging 3.47, 3.81 and 4.08 μM for control, 12.5 and 25 g/d, respectively). The results of this study suggests that AIC taken up by the gastrointestinal wall reached the portal circulation only as Cho and the incomplete recovery may indicate that a portion of AIC is metabolized by the portal-drained viscera of the lactating dairy cow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207