MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554520863 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2016-0167

<i>Dominikia lithuanica</i> and <i>Kamienskia divaricata</i>: new species in the Glomeromycota

2016· article· en· W2554520863 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Janusz Błaszkowski, Gerard Chwat, Anna Góralska

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSporeBiologyBotanyGlomeromycotaHyphaMycosphaerellaMorphology (biology)PaleontologyMycorrhizaSymbiosisBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New species in the genera Dominikia and Kamienskia (Glomeromycota) are characterized based on morphology and sequences of SSU–ITS–LSU nrDNA and the RPB1 gene. Both species produce glomoid spores only in clusters. Spores of Dominikia lithuanica are hyaline to pale yellow and 22–52 μm in diameter when globose. In their three-layered spore wall, layers 1 and 2 are almost equal in thickness and much thinner than the structural laminate layer 3. Spore wall layers 1 and 3 usually stain faintly in Melzer’s reagent. Spores of Kamienskia divaricata remain hyaline regardless of age, are 10–24 μm in diameter and have a spore wall with two layers of nearly the same thickness. The laminate layer 2 usually shows a faint dextrinoid reaction in Melzer’s reagent. A further conspicuous character of K. divaricata spores is a relatively wide subtending hypha at the spore base. In the field, D. lithuanica and K. divaricata have so far been found only twice and once, respectively, and only in maritime sand dunes of the Curonian Spit, Lithuania (D. lithuanica), and South Africa (K. divaricata). Sequence data available in public databases suggest that D. lithuanica has not yet been detected by other researchers, and K. divaricata also occurs in Texas, USA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207