MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2554615863 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316543832.007

Radially Symmetric Thermo-Poroelasticity Problems: Cylindrical Cavity in an Infinite Medium

2016· book-chapter· en· W2554615863 on OpenAlexaff
A. P. S. Selvadurai, A. P. Suvorov

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoromechanicsMechanicsPorous mediumBounded functionMaterials scienceFluid pressureCavity wallPhysicsPorosityMathematicsMathematical analysisComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this chapter, we examine the coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical behavior of a fluid-saturated porous medium of infinite extent bounded internally by a fluid-filled cavity of cylindrical shape. The fluid within the cavity can be subjected, separately or simultaneously, to a temperature rise and a pressure pulse. We present analytical results for this radially symmetric thermo-poroelasticity problem. Examples of the analytical treatment of the isothermal problem of a cylindrical cavity are given by Rice and Cleary (1976) and Detournay and Cheng (1988, 1993). Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical problems of a cylindrical cavity subjected to either a constant temperature change or a constant heat flux were studied by McTigue (1990), Wang and Papamichos (1994, 1999) and Zhou et al. (1998). Zhou et al. (1998) account for thermodynamically coupled heat–water flow known as thermo-osmosis. The case of a rigid cylindrical heat source buried in clay was examined by Seneviratne et al. (1994). Wu et al. (2012) give an analytical solution to the problem of a cylindrical cavity (wellbore) subjected to a constant fluid pressure and temperature rise on the cavity wall, with non-hydrostatic stresses applied remotely. The goal of this chapter is to present analytical results for the development of fluid pressure within a cylindrical cavity located in a fluid-saturated poroelastic medium when the cavity is subjected, separately, to either pressurization or a temperature rise. Computational results for the cylindrical cavity problem were obtained using the finite element program ABAQUS (Student Edition). Thermo-Poroelasticity of a Geomaterial With a Fluid-Filled Cylindrical Cavity Assume that a fluid-filled cylindrical cavity of very large length is embedded into a poroelastic geomaterial. The radius of the cylindrical cavity is a . We place the origin of the cylindrical coordinate system ( r , ϕ, z ) at the center of a circular cross-section of the cavity and direct the z -axis of the coordinate system along the axis of the cylinder (Fig. 6.1). For the sake of simplicity, we can assume that the displacement along the z -axis is zero, i.e., the axial strain ε zz is identically zero. Owing to the linearity of the problem, the effect of non-zero axial strain can be added to the resulting solution later using the superposition principle, as described in Chapter 5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→