MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) Suppress Cytotoxicity of Natural Killer (NK) Cell Lines and Can Be Targets for NK-Mediated Cytolysis

2008· article· en· W2554766738 on OpenAlexaff
Chia-Hsuan Donna Hu, Yoko Kosaka, Armand Keating

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesenchymal stem cellK562 cellsCytolysisInterleukin 12Natural killer cellPerforinCytotoxicityBiologyFlow cytometryLymphokine-activated killer cellGranzymeCell cultureImmunophenotypingCellNK-92ImmunologyInterleukin 21Cell biologyImmune systemCytotoxic T cellIn vitroT cellLeukemiaCD8

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract MSCs are known to modulate immune responses and themselves are not immunogenic in some experimental systems. Given the increasing use of both MSCs and NK cells in cell therapy protocols, we investigated interactions between the 2 cell types using human NK cell lines KHYG-1 and NK-92 and human bone marrow-derived MSCs. NK lines were cultured in normal medium, in human MSC-conditioned medium, or in the presence of MSCs at NK:MSC ratio of 10:1 either with direct cell contact or in a transwell system for 96 hours. NK immunophenotype was assessed by flow cytometry. NK cytotoxicity against K562 or MSC target cells was measured by a 4-hour Cr release assay. Granule polarization in NK cells was analyzed by immunostaining of perforin. Results: MSCs suppressed K562 lysis by KHYG-1 after direct cell contact co-culture: 24.8% ±14.4 (SD) versus control KHYG-1 without MSCs: 57.8%±1.4 (p=0.01). In contrast, cytotoxicity of NK-92 was unaffected by MSCs (81.3%±3.8 vs control 84.5%±1.2). We also found that NK-92 but not KHYG-1 lysed MSCs: 25.2%±11.7 vs −4%±4.1, respectively (p=0.001). Moreover, we found that while 57%±16.7 (n=10) of KHYG-1 cells had constitutively polarized granules not specifically directed toward MSCs upon cell-contact, MSCs induced polarization in NK-92 cells from 12.9%±8.8 to 50.5%±7.1 (p=0.000). Although lysis of MSCs by NK-92 may partially account for resistance to MSC-mediated suppression, incubation with MSC-conditioned medium was able to suppress NK-92 cytotoxicity: 49.6%±13.7 vs control 69.3%±8.8 (p=0.001). In transwell studies, K562 killing by KHYG-1 was suppressed (32.7%±9.7 vs control 44.7%±4.7; p=0.002), but such suppression was not observed by NK-92. These data indicate a factor-mediated mechanism of NK suppression with differential sensitivity. Among the possible candidates, we found that kynurenine inhibited KHYG-1 and NK-92 by 50% (p=0.028) and 30% (p=0.017), respectively. Furthermore, KHYG-1 cytotoxicity inhibited by MSCs in transwell system was partially reversed by addition of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (from 44.7%±4.7 to 57.2%±0.5; p=0.002) and a PGE2 synthase inhibitor (from 44.7%±4.7 to 49.7±0.9; p=0.013). Addition of an IDO inhibitor to the PGE2 synthase inhibitor had a synergistic effect on restoration (from 44.7%±4.7 to 62%±4.6; p=0.001). By further characterizing differences in NK-92 and KHYG-1, we found that NK-92 expressed 6-fold less activating receptor NKG2D (MFI: NK-92 4.4 vs KHYG-1 25.6) and 35-fold less activating receptor NKp44 (NK-92 1.1 vs KHYG-1 37.5) than KHYG-1, suggesting that NK-92 killing of MSCs was not mediated by these receptors. Greater killing of MSCs by NK-92 may be due to upregulation of CD94 and CD244 which were increased on NK-92 (CD94: 60.8±4.6 vs control 34.2±12.0, p=0.014; and CD244: 3.8±0.3 vs control 2.7±0.2, p=0.014), but not on KHYG-1, after MSC co-culture. Conclusions: Our study shows that MSCs suppress the cytotoxic action of KHYG-1 and NK-92 via soluble factors, affect phenotypic expression, and change granule polarization. Of importance, MSCs can be lysed by NK-92 but not by KHYG-1. Previous studies demonstrated lysis of MSCs by human activated primary NK cells. Taken together, these observations must be considered when designing clinical protocols with MSCs or NK cell lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207