Exhibition Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Xerox Book Paula Cooper Gallery, New York, 12 September–24 October 2015 Saltwater: A Theory of Thought Forms – 14th Istanbul Biennial Curated by Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev, various locations, Istanbul, 2 September–1 November 2015 Ink Remix: Contemporary Art from Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong Curated by Sophie McIntyre, exhibited at the Canberra Museum and Gallery, 3 July–18 October 2015; Bendigo Art Gallery, 31 October 2015–7 February 2016; University of New South Wales Galleries, 26 February–21 May 2016; Museum of Brisbane, 16 September 2016–19 February 2017 Artist Textiles: Picasso to Warhol Curated by Dennis Nothdruft, Textile Museum of Canada, Toronto, 2 May–4 October 2015 Mark Rothko’s Harvard Murals Curated by Mary Schneider Enriquez, in collaboration with Narayan Khandekar, Carol Mancusi-Ungaro, Christina Rosenberger and Jens Stenger, Harvard Art Museums, Cambridge, 16 November 2014– 26 July 2015 Dries Van Noten: Inspirations Curated by Pamela Golbin, with Karen Van Godtsenhoven, MoMu Fashion Museum, Antwerp, 13 February–19 July 2015, originally presented at Musée des Arts Décoratifs (curated by Pamela Golbin), Paris, 1 March–2 November 2014
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.626 | 0.455 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".