MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554833461 · doi:10.2527/jam2016-1580

1580 Effects of feeding canola meal or wheat dried distillers' grains with solubles alone or in combination as the major protein sources on ruminal function and production in dairy cows

2016· article· en· W2554833461 on OpenAlexaffabout
Saman Abeysekara, T. Mutsvangwa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin squareCanolaDistillers grainsMealFood scienceAnimal scienceDairy cattleLysineBiologyChemistryRumenFermentationBiochemistryAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canola meal (CM) is a good-quality protein supplement that is readily available and is used extensively in dairy cow diets in Canada and the United States. On the other hand, major growth of the ethanol industry in western Canada has resulted in large quantities of wheat dried distillers' grains with solubles (WDDGS) being available as an alternative protein supplement for dairy cows. Canola meal is an excellent source of limiting essential AA (e.g., lysine, histidine), whereas WDDGS has a greater CP content but is a poorer source of lysine; therefore, it is reasonable to consider that a judicious combination of CM and WDDGS as protein supplements may provide an optimal profile of essential AA that would improve milk production. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of feeding CM or WDDGS alone or in combination as the major sources of protein on ruminal fermentation characteristics and production in dairy cows. Fifteen lactating dairy cows (697 ± 46 kg BW and 76 ± 16 d in milk at the beginning of the experiment) were used in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design with 28-d periods (20 d of dietary adaptation and 8 d of measurements). Five cows in one Latin square were ruminally cannulated to facilitate ruminal sampling. The dietary treatments were 1) 100% CM as the major protein supplement, 2) 75% CM and 25% WDDGS, 3) 50% CM and 50% WDDGS, 4) 25% CM and 75% WDDGS, and 5) 100% WDDGS. Diets were isonitrogenous (17.6% CP) and were fed as TMR containing 50% forage and 50% concentrate. Dry matter intake (mean = 30 kg/d) was unaffected by diet. Milk production (40.4, 41.0, 41.2, 40.4, and 40.2 kg/d for the 100, 75, 50, 25, and 0% CM diets, respectively) was unaffected by diet. Milk composition was unaffected by diet; however, milk urea nitrogen linearly decreased (P= 0.05) as the dietary proportion of CM decreased. Ruminal pH and concentrations of total and individual VFA were unaffected by diet. These results show that when dairy diets are formulated to contain 17.6% CP, CM or WDDGS can be fed alone or in combination as the major sources of protein and can support similar levels of milk production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207