MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2555150932 · doi:10.1109/piers.2016.7735611

Data fusion analysis of Sea Surface Temperature from HY-2A satellite radiometer

2016· article· en· W2555150932 on OpenAlexaff
X. Li, Jingsong Yang, Gang Zheng, Guoqi Han, Lin Ren, Juan Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea surface temperatureRemote sensingSatelliteRadiometerAdvanced very-high-resolution radiometerSensor fusionRoot mean squareEnvironmental scienceFusionMicrowave radiometerMeteorologyGeologyComputer scienceClimatologyPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global sea surface is not seamlessly covered by the along-track sea surface temperature (SST) data of the scanning microwave radiometer (SMR) aboard the Haiyang-2A (HY-2A) satellite, the first ocean dynamic environment satellite of China. In this paper, this coverage problem was solved by data fusion. The whole procedure includes the following steps. First, SST data within 200km of the coastline were removed, and so were outliers. Second, the HY-2A SST data were gridded, filtered and corrected. Third, the inverse distance weighted (IDW) method was used to merge the HY-2A SST data into those from an operational, high-resolution, combined sea surface temperature and sea ice analysis (OSTIA) system. The Global 1-km Sea Surface Temperature (G1SST) data were used as the reference data. The root mean square (RMS) difference between the along-track SST data of HY-2A and the G1SST SST data is 1.3°C. The HY-2A SST data were about 83% left and the RMS is 0.7°C after preprocessing. The along-track SST data of HY-2A can be well used for data fusion. The RMS for the fusion results is 0.6°C, and the gaps between tracks were filled up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→