MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555328666 · doi:10.1016/j.artres.2016.08.040

PO-37 THE IMPACT OF INTRADIALYTIC PEDALING EXERCISE ON ARTERIAL STIFFNESS IN A HEMODIALYSIS POPULATION

2016· article· en· W2555328666 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra B. Cooke, Vincent Ta, Yessica-Haydee Gomez, Sameena Iqbal, Stella S. Daskalopoulou

Bibliographic record

VenueArtery Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineArterial stiffnessHemodialysisCardiologyPopulationInternal medicinePhysical therapyBlood pressureEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Hemodialysis patients are at greater risk of increased arterial stiffness. Regular aerobic exercise has been shown to reduce arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients. However, the impact of a more realistic intradialytic form of exercise, such as pedaling, is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to examine 1) the effect of intradialytic pedaling exercise on arterial stiffness over 4 months, and 2) the durability of the pedaling effect 4 months after finishing the exercise intervention. Methods: We performed a 4-month randomized control trial in patients on a stable in-center hemodialysis regimen (3 days/week). Subjects were block randomized to either pedaling exercise (EX) or to a control group receiving usual dialysis (nonEX) for 4 months. At baseline and 4 months, augmentation index heart rate corrected (AIx75), and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) were assessed (applanation tonometry; SphygmoCor XCEL). Measurements were repeated in the EX group 4 months after the exercise intervention. Results: 11 exercisers (58±16 years, BMI 26±5kg/m2, 3 female) and 10 controls (53±15 years, BMI 27±6kg/m2, 3 female) were included. Overall exercise compliance was 60±25%, and subjects exercised on average 47±25 mins per session. AIx75 was unchanged in the EX group, however an increase of 4.4±4.5% was noted in the nonEX group (P=0.020). We observed a greater absolute decrease in cfPWV in the EX group compared to the nonEX group: -1.44±2.06 vs. 0.27±0.55 m/s (P=0.037) (Figure 1). This difference in cfPWV was maintained after adjustments for age, Charlson comorbidity score, and the baseline cfPWV value (P=0.041). Interestingly, the decrease in cfPWV observed in the EX group was partially preserved 4 months after exercise cessation (Figure 2). Conclusions: The relationship between intradialytic pedaling exercise and improved arterial stiffness is promising, and warrants further investigation. Moreover, we have demonstrated that pedaling exercise is a realistic form of aerobic training in hemodialysis patients. Figure 1Post-exercise absolute change in cfPWV. Figure 2cfPWV at baseline, post-exercise and 4 months after exercise cessation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtery ResearchSame topicPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207