MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555332038 · doi:10.1115/ipc2016-64614

Minimum Counterbore Length and Taper Angle Criteria for Transition Welds

2016· article· en· W2555332038 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Liu, M. Martens

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring and Maintenance; Materials and Joining · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBendingStress (linguistics)Structural engineeringWeldingAttenuationBending momentMaterials scienceStress concentrationMagnitude (astronomy)Work (physics)EngineeringFinite element methodComposite materialMechanical engineeringOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transition welds joining pipes of unequal wall thickness are often used in gas and oil pipelines at road crossings, bends, fittings, and locations of class change. Pipeline operators have successively utilized a counterbore-tapered design for transition of unequal wall thickness. In the counterbore-tapered design, the wall thickness transition is moved away from a girth weld region, resulting in reduction of stress concentration near the girth weld, subsequently reducing the risk of hydrogen assisted cracking (HAC) and the driving force for fatigue crack growth. The counterbore length (L) is an important design parameter in the design of the counterbore-tapered joint. The aim of specifying the minimum counterbore length is to ensure that any local moments caused by the interaction of longitudinal stress and the dissimilar wall thickness are satisfactorily attenuated when they reach the weld area. While determining the minimum counterbore length, the present counterbore-tapered design criteria considers the attenuation of the bending stress induced by the local moments but does not consider the bending stress magnitude. In certain cases, although the bending stress attenuation length is long, the magnitude of the bending stress is very small. The long counterbore length creates practical challenges for boring the pipe due to the limitation of boring tools. Since the magnitude of the bending stress is very small, it is not necessary to fully attenuate the bending stress. In this work, the minimum required counterbore length (L0) criteria was revised. The revised counterbore length criteria considered the magnitude of the bending stress and the stress attenuation, hence avoided the unnecessary long counterbore length. The revised criteria was based on an analytical solution and supported by detailed finite element analyses. The analyses showed that the minimum counterbore length can be greatly reduced for those cases required unnecessarily long counterbore length with negligible or small increase in the stress concentration in the weld area. The present design method of counterbore-tapered joints allows only one value of taper angles at thickness transition, i.e., 14°. However, for some situations, creating the smoothness required with the 14° taper angle is difficult and an increase in the taper angle is preferred. In this work, it is shown that the stress concentration near the wall thickness transition and weld area for counterbore-tapered joints changes marginally by increasing taper angle from 14° to 30°.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring and Maintenance; Materials and JoiningSame topicFatigue and fracture mechanicsFrench-language works237,207