MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555823994 · doi:10.1353/gpr.2016.0033

From Treaty Peoples to Treaty Nation: A Road Map for All Canadians by Greg Poelzer, Ken S. Coates

2016· article· en· W2555823994 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brenden W. Rensink

Bibliographic record

VenueGreat Plains research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreatyIndigenousPeace treatyState (computer science)Political scienceGeographyEconomic historyLawHistoryPoliticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: From Treaty Peoples to Treaty Nation: A Road Map for All Canadians by Greg Poelzer, Ken S. Coates Brenden W. Rensink From Treaty Peoples to Treaty Nation: A Road Map for All Canadians. By Greg Poelzer and Ken S. Coates. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2015. vii + 324 pp. References and further reading, index. $37.95 cloth. To understand the Great Plains as a region from the ground up, one should start, arguably, with the environment: the soil, the plants and animals, mountains and rivers, geographies and climates—the things that define it as a place. Beyond that, a firm understanding of its indigenous peoples should rank next. Unfortunately, this is one of the most routinely overlooked, underresearched, and misunderstood aspects of Great Plains history, experience, and contemporary living. This is true both north and south of the United States–Canadian border. For the Canadian Great Plains, issues of aboriginal homelands, pre-and postcontact migrations, involvement in European economic enterprise such as the fur trade, and reactions to Euro-Canadian expansion, war-and treaty-making, and continued presence in the region are all deeply woven into the historical contexts that explain modern-day realities. The Canadian Prairie Provinces cannot be divorced from their aboriginal roots. Indeed, this goes for the whole of Canada. In this light, the contemporary state of affairs in Canada grapples with the histories of European–First Nations interactions, and persisting problems within the same. According to Greg Poelzer and Ken S. Coates, Canada is made of treaty peoples (both aboriginal and nonab-original) and should be a treaty nation. It is, however, struggling to be such. Surveying history and present, Poelzer and Coates attempt to explain the countless reasons for failures of Canada’s people to live up to its treaty-bound relationships. Their coverage is impressively broad and complex. This is not casual reading and not for the faint of heart. It asks Canadians of all background to rise above hundreds of years of intense betrayal, insult, violence, and disagreement in order to chart a path forward together. They offer three keys for reform: providing honor and status for aboriginal peoples in state and society; empowering aboriginal peoples in government; and expanding economic opportunity to give aboriginal peoples equal footing with other Canadians (xx). Divided into four parts, their text offers aboriginal and nonab-original perspectives on historical problems, current affairs, and possible futures, stories of success, and various policy ideas and regimes that could provide the framework [End Page 141] for further fruitful development. A fair amount of diversity is represented, in terms of geography and the wide difference in aboriginal experiences and current issues. One lacking perspective relevant to the Great Plains is the unique status of Métis peoples. A robust dialog with new scholarship by the likes of Chris Andersen (University of Alberta) or Adam Gaudry (University of Saskatchewan) would certainly enrich the debates raised by Poelzer and Coates. In the end, that is the greatest value of this volume. It seeks to force productive debate, not fruitless finger-pointing and rancor. Whether or not it succeeds in doing so for Canada remains to be seen. Whether the United States, including the many indigenous peoples in the Great Plains, takes notice and begins more meaningful discussions of Americans as “Treaty Peoples” and a “Treaty Nation” likewise remains unclear. As a region with strong indigenous history and presence, these are debates worth having—on both sides of the border. Brenden W. Rensink Charles Redd Center for Western Studies Brigham Young University Copyright © 2016 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreat Plains researchSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207