MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Molecular Quantification of Pre-Treatment Bone Marrow Clonal Cells in Multiple Myeloma Is a Novel Predictive Indicator of Remission Length.

2007· article· en· W2555914769 on OpenAlexaff
Kyle J. Thulien, Tony Reiman, Jocelyn Lai, Andrew R. Belch, Linda M. Pilarski

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple myelomaMedicineBone marrowPlasmacytosisInternal medicinePrednisoneThalidomidePlasma cellMonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceMelphalanOncologyPathologyImmunologyGastroenterologyAntibodyMonoclonal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal B-cell malignancy with an accumulation of plasma cells in the bone marrow (BM). Newer treatments continue to increase remission occurrence and decrease side effects, however, relapse invariably occurs. Current diagnostic and monitoring criteria such as bone marrow plasmacytosis (BMPC) and serum M-protein levels (Mpr) fail to predict the length of remission for a given patient. The clonal IgH VDJ gene rearrangement provides a molecular method of measuring the MM disease burden. This unique biomarker can identify and quantify the number of malignant cells through analysis of genomic DNA with quantitative PCR. Here we use SYBR Green real-time quantitative PCR (rqPCR) to measure the level of clonal cells, termed VDJ%, in 91 previously untreated and 51 relapsed pre-treatment BM aspirates from MM patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that VDJ%s lower than the median were associated with longer event free survivals (EFSs) (p=0.0077, HR=0.57). These patients were treated with a variety of different regimens (including VAD, ASCT, Melphalan, Prednisone, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone, Velcade or Revlimid). A modest correlation between the VDJ% and the BMPC was observed (p=0.0003, r2=0.099) but, the BMPC was not able to stratify these patients into groups with significantly different EFSs (p=0.1153, HR=0.6521) as was the VDJ%. This result confirms the BMPC’s poor association with outcome. The Mpr was not significantly correlated with VDJ% (p=2312, r2=0.012). The IMWG response subcategories correlated well with EFS where the poorer the response the shorter the EFS. However, there was no significant correlation between the pre-treatment VDJ% and the response subcategories. In addition to the pre-treatment BM samples, the tumor burden in 30 remission BM samples was quantified. To date, neither the remission VDJ% nor the reduction in VDJ% relative to the pre-treatment VDJ% was associated with EFS in a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The remission VDJ% had a significant yet modest correlation with the remission BMPC (p=0.014, r2=0.27) and nadir Mpr (p=0.0001, r2=0.61). Additionally, the IMWG response subcategory correlated with the proportionate reduction of the remission BM (p=0.036). Taken together these results indicate that VDJ% in pre-treatment BMs, but not the matched BMPC or Mpr, is a significant measure of outcome. The percent of clonal cells as measured in BM aspirates with rqPCR could be developed as a novel tool for predicting outcome by placing patients into a high risk or low risk category for EFS. Patients with a higher than median VDJ% have a shorter EFS than patients with a VDJ% below the median. RqPCR enumerates all cells containing the clonal sequence and thus may include relevant cells types not counted in the BMPC or reflected in the protein electrophoresis and not proportionally represented in remission BMs. The predictive value of pre-treatment VDJ% occurred despite varying types of therapy and tumor response, suggesting that these factors might provide independent prognostic information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→