MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555946162 · doi:10.4172/2161-1068.1000225

The Quantiferon®-TB Gold In-Tube Assay Detects Interferon- Release Responses to Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Antigens for Extended Periods of Time

2016· article· en· W2555946162 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Takashi Hirama, Shohei Minezaki

Bibliographic record

VenueMycobacterial Diseases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisInterferon γAntigenImmunologyMedicineQuantiFERONInterferon gammaMicrobiologyVirologyBiologyImmune systemLatent tuberculosisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development and wide usage of interferon (IFN)-γ release assays (IGRAs) brought remarkable advances in the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT), one of the IGRAs, employs three TB antigens, ESAT-6, CFP-10, and TB7.7, to which cell-mediated immune responses are measured in a single tube. In this regard, the QFT-GIT in patients with active TB was hypothesized to detect TB positivity for a longer period after the initiation of treatment. The change of IFN-γ values in patients with pulmonary TB serially registered to the study was examined with QFT-GIT before initiating anti-TB drugs, after completion of treatment and 12 months after the cessation of treatment. The data demonstrates that the IFN-γ levels remained consistently positive for a period of one year after treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMycobacterial DiseasesSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207