MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555950170

THE ROOKIE TEACHER: A DESCRIPTION OF THE OCCASIONAL TEACHING EXPERIENCE AS SEEN THROUGH THE EYES OF NEW SUPPLY TEACHERS

2014· article· en· W2555950170 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C.A. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationPsychologyPedagogyMedical educationMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this project was to generate a set of actionable recommendations to assist school districts and school administrators and staff to support new occasional teachers during the early stages of their professional careers. This was done by giving voice to six elementary occasional teachers who were working at the Kindergarten to Grade 6 level in a single school board in southeastern Ontario who reported their shared “entry to the profession” experiences. This project describes the challenges faced by novice supply teachers, and the nature of support systems currently available to new occasional teachers (including their ease of access) and articulates practical suggestions to improve the unique induction to the teaching profession experienced by entry-level Ontario teachers.
\nPhenomenology was used as a framework for this project’s research design which included six semi-structured interviews with participants who had at least one, but not more than five, years of experience as an occasional teacher. Qualitative inductive analysis was used for the interview transcripts to discover patterns, themes, and categories. The six participants in this study described how they approach managing student behaviour in their classrooms, the extent to which they see themselves as professionals, and their overall perspectives regarding occasional teaching in elementary education. Findings suggest that communication could be established or improved in the following areas: mentor/mentee programs, document accessibility, clear expectations for procedures and day plan formats and contents. The participants of this study suggested 11 different practical recommendations for the improvement of the occasional teacher experience. 
\nThis research offers three main implications for practice in the field of elementary education. First, teacher preparation programs must work to ensure that prospective occasional teachers are aware of both the challenges that they may face in the field as occasional teachers and approaches for addressing those challenges. Second, supervisors such as principals, vice-principals, and lead teachers in the field of elementary education should be made aware of the challenges faced by occasional teachers. Lastly, schools and school districts should consider establishing formal or informal mentorship opportunities for occasional teachers who are entering the profession or encountering difficulties associated with being a new occasional teacher.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesFrench-language works237,207