PT118 Difference in the Functional Capacity of Heart Failure Patients With and Without Depressive Symptoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) is a neuromuscular disease leading to several impairments, including decrease of lower limb coordination. The Lower Extremity Motor Coordination Test (LEMOCOT) is an outcome measure recently developed for stroke population. The aim of this study was to document: 1) intra- and interrater reliability; 2) the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change; and 3) the construct validity of the measurements obtained with the LEMOCOT in the adult ARSACS population.The LEMOCOT has shown a good intra- and interrater reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 for both dominant and non-dominant side. The construct validity (hypothesis testing) is satisfying where LEMOCOT's score negatively correlated with participants' age (r = − 0.74) and the score of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (r = − 0.86) and positively correlated with the balance and mobility tests (r = 0.82 with the Berg Balance Scale, r = 0.61 with the Six-Minute Walk Test, r = 0.57 with the 10-Meter Walk Test). The LEMOCOT was also able to distinguish between patients according to disease stages.The LEMOCOT is a valid and reliable tool to assess lower limb coordination in the ARSACS population for whom the lack of coordination is a common symptom.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".