Quit Intentions Moderate Subjective and Physiological Responses to Acute Nicotine Replacement Therapy Administration in Dependent Smokers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the impact of expectancy and administration components of acute nicotine inhaler use on craving, heart rate, and smoking behavior in smokers with varying intentions to quit. METHODS: 47 dependent smokers that differed in self-reported intention to quit (no intention to quit during the next month N = 26 vs. intention to initiate a quit attempt within 2 weeks N = 21) were randomly administered a 4 mg nicotine or nicotine-free inhaler across two sessions. Instructions regarding the inhaler's nicotine content (expect nicotine vs. expect nicotine-free; nicotine expectancy) and flavor (mint vs. citrus) varied across sessions. Craving and heart rate were assessed before and after inhaler administration (two-second inhalations every 10 seconds over 20 minutes). Next, participants were offered an opportunity to self-administer puffs of their preferred tobacco brand during an hour-long progressive ratio task. RESULTS: Across participants, nicotine expectancy independently reduced withdrawal related craving (p = .018), but no comparable effects of nicotine administration were evident. In quitting motivated smokers, nicotine expectancy and administration interacted to reduce intention to smoke (p = .040), while nicotine expectancy (p = .047) and administration (p = .025) independently reduced intention to smoke in quitting unmotivated smokers. Blunted heart rate reactivity to nicotine administration was observed in quitting motivated relative to unmotivated smokers (p = .042); however, neither expectancy nor administration impacted smoking behavior in either group (p values > .25). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that participant quitting intentions moderate acute nicotine replacement therapy responses. In quitting motivated smokers, a combination of pharmacological and psychological factors may be necessary for nicotine replacement therapy to impact craving. IMPLICATIONS: Findings from this study demonstrate that motivations to quit smoking moderate subjective and physiological responses to acute nicotine administration and expectancy in dependent cigarette smokers. Quitting motivated smokers showed blunted heart rate reactivity to nicotine administration, suggesting that they may be less sensitive to the rewarding aspects of nicotine consumption. Nicotine administration and expectancy were found to interact to reduce craving in quitting motivated but not in unmotivated smokers, suggesting that pharmacological and psychological factors may be necessary for nicotine replacement therapy to impact craving in smokers who plan to quit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".