MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Functional analysis of the Human Pbx Interacting Protein (HPIP) in Human Hematopoiesis

2008· article· en· W2556243957 on OpenAlexaff
Pawandeep Kaur, Christiane Stadler, Farid Ahmed, Monica Cusan, R. Keith Humphries, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Christian Buske, Michaela Feuring‐Buske

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTransactivationProgenitor cellStem cellHaematopoiesisMolecular biologyCell biologyCD34PopulationTranscription factorGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The recognition of novel proteins that regulate human hematopoietic stem cell and early progenitor cell fate is a prime objective in experimental and clinical hematology. Human hematopoietic PBX interacting protein (HPIP), with no significant homology to known proteins, is a 731 amino acid protein, discovered as a novel interacting partner of the PBX homeodomain protein. HPIP has been implicated as a nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttle molecule and shown to have the capacity to bind to the cytoskeleton. It also inhibits the ability of PBX-HOX heterodimers to bind to target sequences and strongly inhibits the transactivation activity of E2A-PBX1 [t(1;19) translocation, which occurs in 25% of pediatric pre-B cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia] (Abramovich C. et al JBC, 2000; Oncogene, 2002). It is highly expressed in human CD34+ progenitor cells, but is silenced in differentiated cells. To gain further insights into the possible functional role of HPIP and its domains and its possible role in a common pathway with HOX transcription co-factor PBX1, HPIP cDNA was cloned in pMSCV-IRES-YFP cassette. Umbilical cord blood enriched with CD34+ population of stem cells was obtained to perform in vitro and in vivo experiments. Mutants, with deletions of the microtubule binding region (ΔMBR-HPIP), and nuclear receptor and PBX1 interacting motif (ΔNRPID-HPIP) were generated and tested in vitro and in vivo. The constitutive expression of HPIP wt and ΔMBR-HPIP in human cord blood cells (CD34+) enhanced erythroid colony formation in CFC assay (p=0.008, n=6) while the ΔNRPID-HPIP mutant nullified the effect. Both mutants of HPIP augmented significantly, the formation of primitive colonies (GEMM and GM) in methylcellulose assay (p≤0.01, n=6) as compared to YFP control and HPIP wt. In replating CFC assays ΔNRPID-HPIP showed an increased number of myeloid colonies (p≤0.01, n=6) and GM (p=ns) colonies but a decrease in granulocytic colonies (p≤0.05, n=6) compared to YFP control and HPIP wt

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207