MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

An Essential Role of the Factor VIII Light Chain in Facilitating Heavy Chain Secretion.

2006· article· en· W2556313900 on OpenAlexaff
Lingxia Chen, Juan Li, Hui Lu, Haiyan Jiang, Rita Sarkar, Jinhui Wang, Valder R. Arruda, Glenn F. Pierce, Steven W. Pipe, Paul Liu, Xiao Xiao, Rodney M. Camire, Weidong Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteinImmunoglobulin light chainSecretionChemistryTransfectionMolecular biologyBiologyBiochemistryRNA splicingGeneGeneticsAntibodyRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Blood coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII) is secreted as a heterodimer consisting of a heavy and light chain. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that these chains can be expressed independently. The expressed heavy and light chains can reassociate with recovery of biological activities. These observations have been particularly useful in a gene therapy setting since vector packaging capacity for adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a limiting factor. However, it has been demonstrated that the FVIII heavy chain is expressed ~10–100-fold less efficiently compared to the light chain when expressed independently. Previously the FVIII F309S mutation in the context of B-domainless FVIII (FVIII-BDD) and enhanced glycosylations within the B-domain have been shown to improve factor VIII expression and secretion. However, our in vitro studies indicate that these improvements in secretion were not retained when expressing the heavy chain alone with the same modifications. Other sequences, possibly in the light chain, may facilitate secretion. To investigate this further, we designed an intein trans-splicing strategy to control the addition of light chain to the heavy chain before secretion. Using HEK293 cells, we cotransfected seperate intein light chain and intein heavy chain plasmids and compared results to single plasmid transfected cells. 48 hours post-transfection, FVIII-specific ELISA results demonstrated that cotransfection of intein heavy chain and intein light chain had a significant influence on total heavy chain secretion compared to intein heavy chain expression alone. The co-transfected intein heavy chain and intein light chain were efficiently ligated together yielding a biologically active single chain FVIII derivative as demonstrated by clotting assays and Western blot analysis. Therefore, heavy chain secretion was directly enhanced by the attachment of the light chain to the C-terminus of the heavy chain. A similar phenomenon was not found when heavy and light chains were simply co-expressed in the same cell. It suggested that light chain functioned in cis. Hydrodynamic injection of plasmids with intein heavy chain and intein light chain into hemophilia A mice led to a much higher level of FVIII secretion. The amount of functional FVIII expression reached 3–6 units/ml at peak level. In the absence of intein light chain, FVIII heavy chain secretion was approximately 100 fold less efficient in vivo. To map the key elements of FVIII light in helping FVIII secretion, we made deletion variants in the light chain. These mutants had a dominant negative effect in reducing FVIII and FVIII heavy chain secretion while increasing the level of intracellular FVIII accumulation. Collectively our results are consistent with the conclusion that the FVIII light chain plays a critical role in facilitating heavy chain secretion in cis; probably through helping FVIII heavy chain maintain correct configuration and folding. The strategy to manipulate FVIII light chain addition through intein mediated trans-splicing reaction may also be explored for human gene therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVirus-based gene therapy research→French-language works237,207→