La Contribución Del Pensamiento De Robert Logan Al Desarrollo De La Ecología De Los Medios |Contribution Thought of Robert Logan To The Development of Media Ecology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En agosto de 2013, Robert K. Logan, doctor en fisica y destacado miembro de la segunda generacion de la “Escuela de Toronto” –que recupera el pensamiento de Herbert Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980)-, dicto un seminario sobre nuevos medios y comunicaciones digitales en el Tecnologico de Monterrey, campus Estado de Mexico. Logan ha realizado relevantes aportaciones al desarrollo teorico y conceptual de la Media Ecology –en castellano, Ecologia de los Medios-. En esta oportunidad centrare mi atencion en tres aspectos que estimo particularmente relevantes en el trabajo que ha venido desarrollando el profesor Logan durante los anos recientes: 1.- la incorporacion de dos edades mediaticas a las edades mediaticas que habia identificado McLuhan; 2.- el empleo de la Tetrada de McLuhan para la comprension de los nuevos medios digitales; 3.-los argumentos empleados para refutar a quienes consideran a McLuhan como un pensador “tecno optimista”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it