Elosulfase alfa (BMN 110) for the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (Morquio A Syndrome)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Morquio A syndrome is a rare, autosomal recessive, lysosomal storage disorder caused by a deficiency in the enzyme N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase (GALNS). In 2014, the use of recombinant human GALNS, elosulfase alfa, was approved in the European Union, Canada, the United States, Australia, and Brazil for the treatment of Morquio A syndrome. Elosulfase alfa is administered intravenously once-weekly at a dose of 2.0 mg/kg. Areas covered: This is a review of the efficacy, safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and other outcomes of elosulfase alfa treatment of patients with Morquio A. A discussion of other treatment considerations, limitations, and future directions in the use of elosulfase alfa is provided. Expert commentary: Pharmacokinetic studies outside of clinical trials and in 'real-world' clinical settings need to be performed. We cannot currently predict which patient is going to respond well to enzyme replacement therapy; thus, all patients should be given the option to receive treatment for at least 12 months. Additionally, accurate biomarkers for evaluating disease state and drug responsiveness would greatly aid in the treatment of patients with Morquio A. In addition, improved and innovative daily lifestyle measures are greatly needed to adequately measure clinical response and true impact on quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".