MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Baseline Characteristics of 65 Subjects in the Correction of Anemia with Darbepoetin alfa (DA) in the Community-Dwelling Frail Elderly (CAFE) Study.

2007· article· en· W2556477008 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Artz, Sean X. Leng, Shing‐Shing Yeh, Patrick McKenna, Samisha N. Thomas, Paul Audhya, Steve Doucette, Irene Q. Flores, Z. Shana Geloo, William B. Ershler

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDarbepoetin alfaAnemiaPlaceboQuality of life (healthcare)RandomizationInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialAmbulatoryPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: A growing body of literature has shown a strong and independent association between anemia and poor outcomes in older adults. Approximately one-third of all reported cases lack an obvious cause (i.e., unexplained anemia (UA)). The ongoing CAFÉ study aims to evaluate the impact of anemia correction on Quality of Life (QoL), as measured by the SF-36, in community-dwelling adults 70 years and older with UA. Described here are baseline characteristics from the first 65 subjects. Methods: A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, 24-week blinded study followed by an optional 22-week open-label extension. Participating subjects were anemic, non-dialysis, ambulatory, community-dwelling adults that met at least one criteria of the Frailty Index. Major enrollment criteria required a hemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 9.0 but <11.5 g/dL, estimated GFR > 30 ml/min/1.73m2, and adequate stores of iron, B12 and folate. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to either darbepoetin alfa (DA) starting at 60 mcg Q2W or placebo for 22 weeks. Hb was monitored every two weeks to ensure a rate of rise not to exceed 2 g/dL. QoL was measured by a Geriatric Panel at randomization (baseline) and weeks 10, 24, 36 and 48. QoL and physical function were also measured at baseline, week 12 and week 28. Results: The baseline characteristics (mean ± SD) are reported in Table 1. The mean Hb was 10.9 g/dL and mean C-reactive protein was 1.4 mg/L. Subjects had a mean serum creatinine of 1.2 mg/dL ± 0.4 g/dL and an estimated GFR of 54.8 ± 21.4 ml/min/1.73m2. Inadequate serum erythropoietin (EPO) for the degree of anemia was nearly universal (mean EPO = 19.8 ± 13.9 mU/ml, range = 4–27 mU/ml). The mean QoL scores were consistent with those observed in prior observational studies. Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study patients (n=65) Demographics Hematology Age 81.3 (6.5) (range = 70–95) Hemoglobin 10.9 ± 0.6 MCV 93.6 ± 16.5 Sex Reticulocyte count 1.2 ± 0.5 Men 39 (63.9%) Women 22 (36.1%) Chemistry Race Serum iron 71.8 ± 27.1 White 52 (82.5%) Iron Binding Capacity 335.7 ± 85.7 Black 10 (15.9%) Percent Iron Saturation 22.3 ± 10.4 Middle Eastern 1 (1.6%) Ferritin 171.4 ± 249.9 Creatinine 1.2 ± 0.4 Geriatric Panel eGFR 54.8 ± 21.4 BUN 25 ± 8.5 Frailty Index EPO 19.8 ± 13.9 0–1 10 (16.7%) Albumin 3.9 ± 0.8 2–3 34 (56.7%) ESR 32.9 ± 17.9 4–5 16 (26.7%) CRP 1.4 ± 2.2 Grip Strength 19.2 ± 8.8 MMSE 28.5 ± 1.8 FACIT-An 49.6 ± 12.8 SF-36 57.7 ± 16.6 CES-D 11.2 ± 9.8 IADL 12.1 ± 3.0 Conclusion: Baseline summary statistics for subjects in the CAFÉ study showed UA to be a mild normocytic hypoproliferative anemia exhibiting minimal elevation of inflammatory markers. The low serum EPO observed suggests that renal endocrine insufficiency may contribute to the pathogenesis of UA and further supports a trial evaluating the impact of DA administration on correction of anemia. The data further show that enrolling frail, community-dwelling, elderly adults having UA in an interventional trial is feasible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicErythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentFrench-language works237,207