0482 CNCPS fractions of value added pellet products based on combination of new co-products from bio-fuel/bio-oil processing, low grade of peas and lignosulfonate chemical compound at different levels for ruminants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carinata meal, new co-product from bio-fuel processing, is ready to be used as animal feed nowadays. Canola meal has high levels of methionine and cysteine, but limiting in lysine. Pulse products contain high starch, also have high levels of lysine and tryptophan. There is little information available on chemical profile, as well as its nutritive value especially when it blends with other feedstuff as a pellet. The aim of this project was to test and develop eight high-value added pellet products (BPP) based on combination of co-products from bio-fuel/bio-oil processing, low grade of peas and lignosulfonate at different levels for ruminants. Statistical analyses were performed using PROC MIXED procedure of SAS 9.3 with significance declared at P < 0.05. The results from CNCPS 6.5 system indicated all canola based pellet products BPP5 (low level of canola meal, high level of peas and no lignosulfonate), BPP6 (low level of canola meal, high level of peas and lignosulfonate), BPP7 (high level of canola meal, low level of peas and no lignosulfonate) and BPP8 (high level of canola meal, low level of peas and lignosulfonate) showed higher levels of indigestible protein (PC, P < 0.05) and higher soluble true protein (PA2, P < 0.05). All carinata based pellet products showed the higher fiber bound protein (PB2, P < 0.05). BPP3 (high level of carinata meal, low level of peas and no lignosulfonate), BPP4 (high level of carinata meal, low level of peas and lignosulfonate), BPP7 and BPP8 had the higher levels of water-soluble carbohydrates (CA4, P < 0.05); BPP1 (low level of carinata meal, high level of peas and no lignosulfonate), BPP2 (low level of carinata meal, high level of peas and lignosulfonate), BPP5 (low level of canola meal, high level of peas and no lignosulfonate) and BPP6 showed the higher levels of starch (CB1, P < 0.05), while BPP1, BPP3 and BPP4 had higher digestible fiber (CB3, P < 0.05). In conclusion, carinata meal can be used as a potential feed ingredient for ruminants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".