0464 Degradation kinetics and bypassed nutrients of value added pellet products based on combination of new co-products from bio-fuel/bio-oil processing, low grade of peas, and lignosulfonate chemical compound at different levels for ruminants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New co-product, carinata meal, from bio-fuel processing is ready to be used as animal feed nowadays. Conventional co-product, canola meal, has high levels of methionine and cysteine, but limiting in lysine. Low grade of peas contains high starch content and also has high levels of lysine and tryptophan. There is little information available on nutrient profile, as well as degradation kinetics, especially when it blends with other feedstuff as a pellet. The aim of this project was to test and develop eight high value added pellet products (BPP) based on combination of co-products from bio-fuel/bio-oil processing, low grade of peas and lignosulfonate at different levels for ruminants. Statistical analyses were performed using PROC NLIN and PROC MIXED procedures of SAS 9.4 with significance declared at P < 0.05. The results showed that BPP1 (low level of carinata meal, high level of peas and no lignosulfonate), BPP2 (low level of carinata meal, high level of peas and lignosulfonate), BPP5 (low level of canola meal, high level of peas and no lignosulfonate), BPP6 (low level of canola meal, high level of peas and lignosulfonate) and BPP8 (high level of canola meal, low level of peas and lignosulfonate) had the higher rate of degradation (Kd) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between all blend pellet products (BPP) on soluble fraction in situ (S), insoluble but potentially degradable fraction in situ (D) and undegradable fraction in situ (U) (P > 0.10). BPP3 (high level of carinata meal, low level of peas and no lignosulfonate), BPP4 (high level of carinata meal, low level of peas and lignosulfonate) and BPP7 (high level of canola meal, low level of peas and no lignosulfonate) and BPP8 had the higher rumen undregradable dry matter (BDM) (P < 0.05); while BPP1, BPP2, BPP5 and BPP6 had the higher effective degradability of dry matter (EDDM) (P < 0.05). In conclusion pellet products with high level of co-products had the higher rumen undegradable dry matter. Further study on intestinal digestion of nutrients is needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".